Grants awarded competitively to organizations that have the capacity to develop and implement services for public (including volunteers, staff, and library boards), academic (postsecondary), school (K-12), and special libraries (such as those in prisons) across Pennsylvania.
No specific dollar amounts is set aside to fund grants in the categories. Available funds are awarded to organizations with applications that are the most competitive and closely aligned with the goals and outcomes outlined in Pennsylvania’s LSTA Five-Year Plan
Apply for a Statewide Library Service grant via eGrants. Access eGrants through MyPDESuite with your Keystone ID.
Projects must occur from July 1 through June 30.
Click the links below to learn more about how to apply:
Successful projects may be selected for renewals at the discretion of the Pennsylvania Department of Education. If selected, contracts may be renewed annually for an additional four years. Each subsequent year of the grant, after the first, is contingent upon satisfactory performance and the availability of funds. Additionally, the award amount in subsequent years may change from the initial contract year. If renewed, the grant recipient will be notified in writing, on an annual basis, of the amount of the grant award and the time period in which the grant funds must be spent.
2024-25 Statewide Library Services Grants | |
January - March 2024 | Interested applicants view Get Ready to Apply Webinar (requires PA Staff Academy log-in) |
April - May 2024 | Applications accepted |
May 2024 | Application review period |
June 2024 | Awards Announced |
July 2024 | Grantees view Manage a Grant Webinar (requires PA Staff Academy log-in) |
July 1, 2024 | Grant activities begin |
>/= Monthly | Financial Reports Due |
October 30, 2024 | Quarter 1 Narrative Report Due |
January 30, 2025 | Quarter 2 Narrative Report Due |
April 30, 2025 | Quarter 3 Narrative Report Due |
April 2025 | Budget revision must be approved |
June 30, 2025 | Grant activities end (all funds encumbered, and supplies/materials received) |
July 30, 2025 | Final Report due (all funds expended) |
August 30, 2025 | Project evaluation due |
2023-24 Statewide Library Services Grants | ||
April 27, 2023 |
|
|
May 1-31, 2023 | Applications accepted | |
June 2023 | Application review period | |
August 2023 | Awards announced | |
October 1, 2023 | Grant activities begin | |
October 31, 2023 | Manage a Grant Webinar (requires PA Staff Academy log-in) | |
March 4, 2024 | Interim report due | |
April 1, 2024 |
|
|
June 30, 2024 | Grant activities end (all funds encumbered, and supplies/materials received) | |
July 30, 2024 | Final Report due (all funds expended) | |
August 30, 2024 | Project evaluation due |
Eligible organizations must be incorporated as a Pennsylvania not-for-profit corporation or be a department or agency of county/local government. If incorporated as a not-for-profit organization, the applicant must be designated as a charitable organization having tax-exempt status under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 501)
Eligible applicants include:
The Statewide Library Service grants require statewide implementation. Local, county, and system wide projects would be funded under local library grant opportunities.
Use eGrants navigation. DO NOT use browser buttons (i.e., the "Back" button).
Save often.
All sections must be marked 'Complete' to activate the 'Complete' button to submit the application for review.
This is VERY IMPORTANT. Reference this information when completing the application.
Because multiple applications for the various grant categories can be submitted, an application identifier must be entered for each application submitted.
Use the following key to determine which code (G#.#) should be entered in the Project Identifier Code section of eGrants.
G1.1 Service Structure Evolution |
G2.1 Library Empowerment |
G3.1 Elevating Libraries |
G1.2 Digital Library Support |
G2.2 User-Focused Service Design |
G3.2 Literacy Leadership |
G1.3 Environmental Impact |
G2.3 Strengthening Governance and Leadership |
G3.3 Professional Development |
Applicants must have conducted an annual audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards for its most recent annual accounting period. If findings were reported on the applicant’s most recent annual audit, the applicant must show evidence of the implementation of a corrective action plan or show satisfactory evidence as to why a corrective action plan is not feasible or needed at this time.
Applicants must demonstrate that they have the essential experience and capacity needed to provide statewide services to public, academic (postsecondary), school (K-12), and special libraries and library staff across Pennsylvania.
The system will not accept attachments over 3MB (megabyte). If you are scanning your attachments, please set the scanner resolution to low. Attachments can only be submitted in WORD, EXCEL and/or PDF formats. Make sure each document is accurately labeled.
Attachments include:
1. Uniform Grant Guidance (PDF) policies and procedures
2. Internet Safety Certification (PDF)
3. Supporting documents that demonstrate the applicant’s experience and capacity with developing and/or implementing library services statewide.
4. Equipment - $5000 Request for Approval form confirmation email.
The Pennsylvania Department of Education’s eGrants System is used by the Office of Commonwealth Libraries to facilitate the electronic completion and submission of grant applications as well as the contracted agreements. The Getting Started Guide that covers the basic function of eGrants is available on the right side of the eGrants 'Home' tab.
Once the application is completed, the workflow status should show "Application Received" OR "Submitted for Peer Review". Seeing "Application Received" OR "Submitted for Peer Review" is the confirmation that the application has been submitted for review.
To change the workflow status from “Data Entry” to "Application Received” OR "Submitted for Peer Review", the Complete Step located at the bottom of the application home page must be clicked. If that button is inactive for you, please make sure all sections of the application are marked as complete. On the application home page, a checkmark will appear next to the section if it’s been marked as complete.
Contact the eGrants help desk at ra-egrantshelp@pa.gov with eGrants system navigation or other technical questions you may have.
After the review process is completed, all applicants will be contacted with the next steps as it pertains to them.
Incomplete applications or those that do not meet the minimum requirements as outlined here will not be reviewed.
Reviewers will use the point values below to score each application.
Project Need The need for the project is clearly linked to the target population and is supported by qualitative and quantitative data. |
||||
20 points |
The need is strongly and clearly articulated. Both qualitative and quantitative data is provided that supports the target audience’s need for the proposed project. |
|||
10 points |
The need is clearly articulated. Either qualitative or quantitative data is provided that supports the target audience’s need for the proposed project. |
|||
5 points |
The need is not clearly articulated. Little qualitative or quantitative data is provided that supports the target audience’s need for the proposed project. |
|||
0 points |
The need is not articulated. No data is provided that supports the target audience’s need for the proposed project. |
|||
Strategic Plan The organization’s strategic plan supports the implementation of the proposed project. |
||||
20 points |
The applicant’s strategic plan supports the proposed project’s implementation, specifically recommending its implementation. |
|||
10 points |
The applicant’s strategic plan implies support for the project’s implementation. |
|||
0 points |
The applicant’s strategic plan does not support the project’s implementation. |
|||
Project Results The proposed project’s results are reasonable and achievable within the project’s timeframe. |
||||
20 points |
The proposed project’s results are reasonable and achievable within the project’s timeframe. |
|||
10 points |
The proposed project’s results are reasonable but may not be achievable within the project’s timeframe. |
|||
0 points |
The applicant’s proposed results are not reasonable or achievable. |
|||
Project Purpose The purpose statement is clear and identifies a benefit that is desirable for the grant category area. |
||||
20 points |
The purpose statement is very clear and identifies a benefit that is highly desirable and innovative for the grant category area. |
|||
10 points |
The purpose statement is clear and identifies a benefit that is desirable for the grant category area. |
|||
5 points |
The purpose statement is vague and identifies a benefit that may be desirable for the grant category area. |
|||
0 points |
The purpose statement is not clear and/or does not identify a benefit that may be desirable for the grant category area. |
|||
Project Activities The project activities and methods support project goals and projected results. |
||||
20 points |
The project activities and methods are innovative and support its goals and projected results. |
|||
10 points |
The project activities and methods loosely support its goals and projected results. |
|||
0 points |
The project activities and methods do not support its goals and projected results. |
|||
Project Outputs Collection of the project’s output measures are feasible/reasonable and support project goals and projected results. An output is a direct product of program activities, usually measured in terms of work accomplished. It is a quantitative measurement. Outputs can be used to measure outcomes; but outcomes cannot be used to measure outputs. |
||||
20 points |
The output measures are feasible to collect and do not place an undue burden on others involved. The outputs support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
10 points |
The output measures are feasible to collect but may place some burden on others involved. The outputs support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
5 points |
The output measures are present to collect but definitely place an undue burden on others involved. The outputs vaguely support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
0 points |
The project does not identify output measures that are feasible to collect, and/or the outputs do not clearly support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
Project Outcomes Collection of the proposed project’s outcomes is feasible/reasonable, and they support project goals and projected results. An outcome is benefits or changes for individuals or populations during or after participating in program activities, including new knowledge, increased skills, changed attitudes or values, modified behavior, improved condition or altered status. It is usually a qualitative measurement. Outputs can be used to measure outcomes; but outcomes cannot be used to measure outputs. |
||||
20 points |
The proposed project outcomes are reasonable, and do not place an undue burden on others involved. The outcomes support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
10 points |
The proposed project outcomes are reasonable but may place some burden on others involved. The outcomes support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
5 points |
The proposed project outcomes are reasonable but definitely place an undue burden on others involved. The outcomes support the project’s goals and projected results. |
|||
0 points | The proposed project outcomes are not reasonable to collect and/or the outcomes do not support the project’s goals and projected results. | |||
Project Timeline The proposed project’s implementation plan is feasible and achievable within the grant timeframe. |
||||
20 points | The proposed project’s implementation plan is feasible and achievable within the grant timeframe. | |||
10 points | The proposed project’s implementation plan is feasible but may not be achievable within the grant time frame. | |||
5 points | The proposed project’s implementation plan may not be feasible or achievable within the grant time frame. | |||
0 points | The proposed project’s implementation plan is not feasible and is not achievable within the grant time frame. | |||
Project Budget The proposed project’s budget clearly describes costs that are reasonable and related to project activities and outcomes. |
||||
20 points | The proposed project’s budget clearly describes costs that are reasonable and related to project activities and outcomes. | |||
10 points | The proposed project’s budget describes costs that are reasonable and related to project activities and outcomes; but some related costs are not included. | |||
0 points | The proposed project’s budget does not describe costs that are reasonable and/or related to project activities and outcomes. | |||
Local Funds Used to Support Project The proposed budget includes local funds or in-kind resources that support project implementation. |
||||
20 points | Excluding state or federal funds, the proposed budget includes both the organization’s own resources and support from partner organizations that are participating in the project. | |||
10 points | Excluding state or federal funds, the proposed budget includes the organization’s own resources to support the project. | |||
5 points | Excluding state or federal funds, the proposed budget includes support from partner organizations that are participating in the project. | |||
0 points | Excluding state or federal funds, the proposed budget does not include the organization’s own resources nor support from partner organizations that are participating in the project. | |||
Organizational Audit Compliance with organizational audit requirements; and, if applicable, implementation of plan of corrective action for any audit findings. |
||||
20 points | Applicant has conducted recent organizational audit without any findings. | |||
10 points | Applicant has conducted recent organizational audit with findings and has implemented a corrective plan of action (or demonstrated a plan is not needed/feasible). | |||
0 points | Applicant has not conducted recent organizational audit. | |||
Uniform Grant Administration Requirements Adoption of policies and procedures that comply with federal Uniform Grant Administration requirements. |
||||
20 points | All policies and procedures have been adopted, and they comply with federal requirements. | |||
10 points | All policies and procedures have been adopted but require the organization to make some changes to comply with federal requirements. | |||
Supporting Attachments The application’s supporting documents demonstrate the organization’s experience and capacity to implement and achieve project activities/goals. |
||||
20 points | The application’s supporting materials demonstrate more than five years of highly satisfactory experience as an OCL Statewide Library Service provider. | |||
10 points | The application’s supporting materials demonstrate two to five years of highly satisfactory experience as an OCL Statewide Library Service provider. | |||
5 points | The application’s supporting materials demonstrate less than two years of highly satisfactory experience as an OCL Statewide Library Service provider. | |||
0 points | The application’s supporting materials do not demonstrate satisfactory experience and/or capacity to provide Statewide Library Services; or past Statewide Library Service grants have been poorly managed. |
Requires Microsoft 365 sign in.
Does the LSTA grant outlined in the webinar require statewide implementation, or would a grant be available for county-wide or system-wide use only?
The Statewide Library Service grants require statewide implementation. Local, county, and system wide projects would be funded under future local library grant opportunities.
Are independent libraries eligible?
Yes. Interested organizations must provide documentation of capacity to manage and administer a statewide library services project.
Are municipal libraries eligible?
Yes. Interested organizations must provide documentation of capacity to manage and administer a statewide library services project.
If our System HQ is not a 501(c)3, we are still able to apply?
Yes. Interested organizations must provide documentation of capacity to manage and administer a statewide library services project. The 501(c)3 requirement specifically applies to Pennsylvania non-profit organizations that focus on Pennsylvania libraries.
Is weight for project approval given to smaller libraries or first-time applicants, or higher weight to systems and large libraries that serve more people (thus impact more people)?
There is no weighted scoring built into the rubric. All applications will be reviewed based on the Evalution Criteria.
Is the Keystone ID for the library, as opposed to those of us employees who may have a Keystone ID?
The Keystone ID is assigned to individuals. The applying organization determines employee(s) authority level and access to eGrants.
Are grant writer expenses allowable?
No, per federal guidelines.
Are consulting firms allowable?
Contracting with a consulting firm to complete LSTA funded project goals is allowable.
If travel is not planned in the grant project, is the travel policy still required?
Yes. The travel policy is one of the four main policies required under the Uniform Administrative Requirements.
The first year of the grant is for 9 months. Understood, that the budget be based on the 9-month grant year. If selected for renewal will future years budgets based on 12 months, especially in regard to salaries and specific trainings planned in a grant cycle.
Yes.
Just clarifying that each project can only use one project identifier code, correct?
Correct.
On the current state library.pa.gov website, is there a place where the LibGuides are linked?
The Commonwealth has put a freeze on updating websites.
Is a consultant providing assessment of library services an allowable grant expense?
If that is an integral part of the LSTA statewide library service project, yes.
Staff support is allowable as an indirect cost, correct?
Correct however, 50% or more of staff involvement on the LSTA funded project would change that allowability. A compensation and fringe benefit policy would be required. Full Time Equivalency (FTE) would be required for reporting under the Salaries/Wages/Benefits budget category.